This week we are analyzing arguments in real world applications. Students will read both a newspaper article and a speech regarding the use of cell phones while driving.
The following homework will be due on Thursday, December 2, 2010.
1. Review both The Mercury news article and the speech by Arnold Schwarzenegger on p. 593-595.
2. Review the definitions of the following terms: oversimplification, false analogy, jumping on the bandwagon and insufficient evidence.
3. Answer the following questions:
A. What is the main proposition in each text?
B. What details does each text include as support?
C. Which text makes more effective use of supporting details? Explain your response.
4. Complete the following pre-writing activities:
A. Make a two column chart with a heading that states the editorial’s proposition. Then, reread the editorial on pages 593-594, and in the left column of the chart, note details and arguments that the author uses for support.
B. Use the right hand column of the chart to note errors in logic or inconsistent reasoning. Also, note details that provide strong support for the editorial’s proposition.
C. Based on your chart, decide if you agree or disagree with the editorial. Then, use the chart to create an outline that you can use as a framework for your letter.
5. Write a persuasive letter responding to the prompt below. Be sure to write in blue or black ink, as this is a final draft you are submitting. Typing is optional, but not required.
Write a letter to the editor to express y0ur agreement or disagreement with the editorial on hands-free cell phone legislation. Point out the strengths or weaknesses in the author’s logic and use of supporting details. If you disagree with the editorial, cite at least one exmple of logical error, bias or inconsistency. If you agree with the author, cite an argument that is well reasoned and logical.
